Top Performing Decklists
| Deck | Creator | Record | Best Finish |
|---|---|---|---|
| Orzhov Pixie | mcwinsauce | 8-2 | 2nd in MTGO Standard Challenge 64 #12774541 |
| Azorius Omniscience | screenwriterny | 8-2 | 2nd in MTGO Standard Challenge 64 #12773970 |
| Azorius Artifacts | vitor mendonca | 6-2 | None |
Performance Stats (Last 14 Days)
Win Rate Impact
Top Table Win Rate
Meta Trend
Sample Size
Tournament Results
Average Copies
Archetypes Using This Card:
Azorius Artifacts , Azorius Control , Azorius Omniscience , Jeskai Control , Orzhov Pixie , Orzhov Raise , Orzhov Tokens , Selesnya Gearhulk
Meta Performance Analysis
Ingenious Smith ranks #1296 out of approximately 5129 cards in raw efficiency (top 25%).
Game Impact Factor
Color Differential
White average: 47.0%
Performance compared to other White cardsBased on our comprehensive multi-metric analysis, Ingenious Smith is a solid card that performs above average in the current meta.
Recommended number of copies: 2
Win Rate Timeline
Card Efficiency Analysis
Raw Efficiency (Win Rate/Mana)
Relative Efficiency
Performance Efficiency: 3.53 (Win rate × Top 8 rate ÷ Mana value)
At 2 mana, the average win rate in the format is 47.5%. Ingenious Smith has a win rate of 60.0%, making it 26.3% better than other 2-mana cards.
Top Performing Partners
| Card Name | Type | Deck Count | Win Rate | 1st Places |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Ensoul Artifact | Enchantment — Aura | 6 | 52.3% | 0 |
| Lurrus of the Dream-Den | Legendary Creature — Cat Nightmare | 7 | 48.6% | 0 |
| Stubborn Denial | Instant | 5 | 47.9% | 0 |
| Ghostfire Blade | Artifact — Equipment | 5 | 47.8% | 0 |
| Stonecoil Serpent | Artifact Creature — Snake | 8 | 43.9% | 0 |
| Ornithopter | Artifact Creature — Thopter | 11 | 43.0% | 0 |
| The Blackstaff of Waterdeep | Legendary Artifact | 7 | 41.3% | 0 |
| Portable Hole | Artifact | 18 | 40.0% | 0 |
| Hushbringer | Creature — Faerie | 5 | 38.5% | 0 |
| Glass Casket | Artifact | 6 | 38.3% | 0 |
Card Synergy Analysis
Cards that perform better with Ingenious Smith than they do on average. A positive synergy score indicates stronger performance together.
| Card Name | Type | Mana | Decks | Win Rate Together | Win Rate Apart | Synergy Score |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Lurrus of the Dream-Den | Legendary Creature — Cat Nightmare | 3 | 6 | 62.9% | 55.9% | +6.9% |
| Ensoul Artifact | Enchantment — Aura | 2 | 5 | 66.7% | 59.8% | +6.8% |
| Stonecoil Serpent | Artifact Creature — Snake | 0 | 7 | 60.0% | 55.0% | +5.0% |
| Shadowspear | Legendary Artifact — Equipment | 1 | 13 | 59.7% | 56.2% | +3.5% |
| Portable Hole | Artifact | 1 | 14 | 60.5% | 57.9% | +2.6% |
| Glass Casket | Artifact | 2 | 6 | 60.7% | 58.2% | +2.5% |
| Hushbringer | Creature — Faerie | 2 | 5 | 60.7% | 58.4% | +2.3% |
| Springleaf Drum | Artifact | 1 | 12 | 59.7% | 58.6% | +1.0% |
| Grafdigger's Cage | Artifact | 1 | 7 | 58.1% | 57.3% | +0.8% |
| Esper Sentinel | Artifact Creature — Human Soldier | 1 | 9 | 57.4% | 57.0% | +0.4% |
Top Archetypes
| Archetype | Deck Count | % of Archetype | Win Rate |
|---|---|---|---|
| Azorius Omniscience | 12 | 1.8% | 25.4% |
| Azorius Control | 2 | 0.4% | 71.4% |
| Jeskai Control | 2 | 0.6% | 48.2% |
| Orzhov Pixie | 2 | 0.8% | 65.0% |
| Azorius Artifacts | 1 | 2.6% | 75.0% |
Statistics Explanation
| Statistic | Description | Formula |
|---|---|---|
| Win Rate Impact | How much this card increases or decreases the win rate of decks that include it, compared to the average deck in the format. | (Win rate of decks with this card) - (Average win rate of all decks) |
| Top Table Win Rate | A weighted win rate that gives more significance to performance in higher tournament placements. First place finishes count for 2x, with diminishing weight down to 8th place. | ∑(wins × placement_weight) / ∑((wins + losses) × placement_weight) |
| Meta Trend | Shows if the card is performing better or worse in the most recent period compared to earlier periods. Positive values indicate improving performance. | (Win rate in recent half of time period) - (Win rate in earlier half of time period) |
| Confidence Factor | A measure of statistical reliability based on sample size. The progress bar indicates how confident we are in the statistics (with larger sample sizes providing higher confidence). | log10(Number of decks + 1) |
| Average Copies | The average number of copies of this card included in decks that use it. | ∑(Copies in each deck) / (Number of decks) |
| Card Synergy Score | Measures how well this card performs with other cards compared to their individual performance. | (Win rate together) - (Average of individual win rates) |
| Raw Efficiency | Win rate points per mana invested. Higher values indicate better returns on mana investment. | (Win rate) / (Mana value) |
| Relative Efficiency | How efficient this card is compared to the average card of the same mana value. | ((Win rate) / (Format average win rate for same mana)) / (Mana value) |
| Performance Efficiency | Combined metric that accounts for win rate, tournament success, and mana investment. | (Win rate × Top 8 placement rate) / (Mana value) |
| Game Impact Factor | A measure of how much this card affects game outcomes, based on win rate adjusted by its deviation from the format average. | Win rate × (1 + (Win rate - Format average) / 100) |
| Color Differential | How this card's win rate compares to the average win rate of other cards of the same color. | Win rate - Average win rate for same color |
All statistics are calculated using tournament data from the selected time period. Sample sizes below 10 decks may not provide statistically significant results.